digital currency hardware wallet, Knowledge graph

Even if there is still some money, which one do you add in the face of so many positions? If you are really given a chance to increase your position by a big drop, you can't achieve the purpose of spreading the cost at all with what little money you have left. Don't say it doesn't make sense to reduce the cost of the whole account, even for the stock you added, it doesn't help much.If it seems that there are not so many things you like, only one or two, then just hold these two and never settle for it. Especially when you are particularly optimistic and particularly sure, you can hold these two in a heavy position.

If it seems that there are not so many things you like, only one or two, then just hold these two and never settle for it. Especially when you are particularly optimistic and particularly sure, you can hold these two in a heavy position.If you are wrong, because your position is small and the loss of a single stock is relatively small, it is easy for you to cut your meat, because you don't feel bad, but if many stocks cut their meat like this, it will be a lot of money, and it will be a big loss.The logic of profiteering is less but better.

At the beginning, the granularity research is coarse, it doesn't matter, and it is slowly eliminated. For example, you can screen by industry, then remove some according to business model, and then remove some according to assets and liabilities, etc. In each round of screening, only the best ones are retained and the poor ones are removed.For this great goal, keep fighting.If you buy everything, even if you don't buy a lot of shares, it will cost a lot of money together. The downside is that when the market plummeted, the funds you could have gradually increased your positions are now taken up and gone.